Author: Press Headliner

 

The number of injuries and fatalities related to car accidents in Los Angeles is on the constant rise. Despite all the effort of the city’s officials to reduce the number of fatalities, there are more car crashes in Los Angeles every day.

In 2015, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti introduced the Vision Zero plan that was supposed to create a 20% drop in all traffic-related fatalities.

However, during the first year of Vision Zero, there was a 43% increase in fatal auto accidents in Los Angeles. In 2017 there was an additional 22% increase in fatal car crashes, and the number of traffic-related deaths continued to grow every year. In 2021, Los Angeles has the highest rate of fatal car accidents and injuries related to motor-vehicle accidents nationwide.

 

Despite Lockdown, Traffic Fatalities Increases

Even the Covid-19 lockdowns couldn’t decrease the number of accidents and deaths in Los Angeles. In 2020 there were 3,723 traffic-related fatalities, even though California wasn’t the one with the highest number of car accidents.

In simple terms, California may have decreased the number of traffic collisions, but they have become more deadly.

 

Post-Lockdown Los Angeles Traffic

Halfway through 2021, Seleta Reynolds, general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, stated that “congestion is back and traffic volumes are creeping back in.” For Los Angeles, this means that once again, a person gets killed in a crash every 36 hours on average. From January to July, that number was as low as 30 hours on average.

 

• Looking at the LAPD data, we learn that DUI crashes have risen 20% and DUI crashes resulting in severe injuries have gone up 73%, while the number of DUI fatal crashes also increased by 9%.
• Next, we have hit and run crashes which have gone up 25%, with those causing severe damages going up 25%.
• Car accidents involving pedestrians have gone up a staggering 45%.
• In addition, bicycle drivers now have a 34% more chance of getting hit by a car in Los Angeles, with a 40% increased risk of getting killed in such a crash.

 

 

 

Dangerous Driving Areas in Los Angeles

The same LAPD data shows that some parts of Los Angeles are disproportionately more dangerous than others. For example, in the first half of 2021, as many as 100 people died in car accidents in the South L.A. and San Fernando Valley regions. The West and Central L.A. together have about 48 car accident fatalities.

Reynolds gives a good explanation of this phenomenon:

“We’ve got a lot of freeways that bisect the southern part of the city. And we’ve got a lot of arterials adjacent to those freeways, like Adams Boulevard, that have not received the kinds of safety treatments that we’ve been trying to get to across the city…

The Valley is another part of the city that has a lot of really wide, fast streets — I think about streets like Victory and Vanowen — because it’s been historically a very car-heavy and car dependent part of the city, due to its land-use patterns. Long distances that people travel to live their lives daily requires them to drive.”

According to a top Los Angeles car accident attorney and the latest UCS-Crosstown LA study, these are the top 5 most dangerous intersections in Los Angeles:

• Sherman Way and Sepulveda Boulevard
• Manchester Avenue and Figueroa Street
• Burbank and Sepulveda boulevards
• Van Nuys and Roscoe boulevards
• Victory Boulevard and Coldwater Canyon Avenue

So, What Are the Odds?

When you look at the CDC reports, you’ll find that you are more likely to die of heart disease more than anything. California’s first cause of death is cardiovascular complications, followed by cancer, Alzheimer’s Disease, and strokes. Car accidents are the fifth leading cause of death in California, but this finding can be misleading.

While it is true that 62,000 people dying from heart diseases in 2019 are a lot more than 3,606 road fatalities, those two conditions depend on different factors.

While heart disease depends on genetics, environmental habits, and other medical conditions, auto accidents depend primarily on our own driving habits. Therefore, they are preventable.

However, if you are interested in numbers, car insurance companies have those ready for you. The data collected shows that an average driver will file a car accident claim every 17.9 years. This means that if you get your license at the age of 16, you’ll have at least three car crashes in your lifetime.

The chances of car accidents increase in teen drivers because they are much less experienced but more prone to alcohol consumption and speeding without wearing a seat belt. The chances of a driver getting killed in a car accident are 1 in 103 for every 1,000 miles driven. However, many factors contribute to these numbers.

Speeding, bad weather, poor road conditions, distracted driving, and driving under the influence are just some of them.

However, the odds of getting injured in a car accident are a bit harder to predict. Looking at the emergency rooms statistics and comparing it with the car accident and fatality data in Los Angeles, for every fatality, there are eight people who need to receive treatment at the emergency room.

The data only shows those car accident victims that need to be treated, but there can be thousands of those suffering from minor injuries or injuries that can be treated at the scene.

JERUSALEM — In an unusually harsh speech, President Mahmoud Abbas on Friday gave Israel one year to end its occupation of territories the Palestinians want for a future state. He threatened to withdraw recognition of Israel — a cornerstone of three decades of failed peace efforts — if it failed to do so.

Abbas delivered the vague ultimatum in a long, prerecorded address to the U.N. General Assembly in which he accused Israel of “apartheid” and “ethnic cleansing,” explosive terms rarely employed by the 85-year-old leader, who has long been committed to a two-state solution.

“If the Israeli occupation authorities continue to entrench the reality of one apartheid state as is happening today, our Palestinian people and the entire world will not tolerate such a situation,” Abbas said. “Circumstances on the ground will inevitably impose equal and full political rights for all on the land of historical Palestine, within one state.”

A one-state solution, while popular with some Israeli and Palestinian activists, would mean the end of Israel as a Jewish-majority state. No major Israeli or Palestinian party supports such an outcome.

Abbas spoke against a backdrop showing the Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem, a flashpoint holy site sacred to Muslims and Jews, and a series of maps of the region showing Israel’s territorial expansion over several decades of war and conflict.

He said he was willing to negotiate final borders over the coming year but that if Israel did not ultimately end its occupation of territories seized in the 1967 war, then he would reconsider recognition of Israel.

“If this is not achieved, why maintain recognition of Israel based on the 1967 borders?” Abbas said. He also threatened to confront Israel at the International Court of Justice.

Gold has always been an integral part of India’s deep and rich culture. The charm and luxury that it holds are beyond anything. However, it has become one of the costliest precious metals in the world. If compared with Silver, the same amount of money that will get you boxes full of Silver would get you just a handful of this yellow metal because of its value.

The major factor behind the surge in prices of this commodity can be contributed to its presence in the ecosystem. As you might know just like many other natural resources, Gold is not available in abundance. But the demand for this commodity has always been rising. This is the reason that its price keeps increasing day by day.

Liquidity

At present, if you wish to purchase this yellow Metal, you have to spend thousands of rupees just to buy a few grams of gold. That is more than enough to burn a hole in one’s pocket. But do you have a stock of ornaments or scrap products made out of it? If yes, then it’s the best time to make some quick money without getting into paper works.

Gold has become one of the highest liquid assets in the world’s economy. Most of the countries are still running their economy depending on yellow metal Reserves. It is sufficient enough to tell the importance of this metal at this time. There are situations when we need quick cash. These situations never give a hint before entering our lives.

That time becomes very difficult for us to arrange quick cash. However, if you have old jewelry in your house, then you need not worry even for a second. In India, you will find many gold buyers that are ready to buy your ornaments of scrap items made out of this metal. You find cash for gold in Gurgaon, Delhi, Noida, and in many cities of India.

Sell Gold for Cash

You can easily your yellow metal for cash to these buyers. All they need is your items and that is enough for them to give out cash in return. The process of converting your cash into gold is a very easy process. You do not need any kind of papers or bills to initiate the process.

All you have to do is visit and Gold Buyer near your place and hand him your possessions. In return of these possessions, he will offer you cash as per the weight. However, there are many things that you would have to consider before taking your ornaments. This is because there are many buyers whose only intention is to deceive you by committing fraudulent activities.

Below mentioned are some of the ways that will protect you from these fraudulent buyers. Make sure you read them carefully.

Weigh your gold: if you have the required machine at your house, do weigh your possessions at the home in advance. In case you happen to meet a cheat buyer, he will try to make false claims regarding the weight of gold. It will help him in making a deal where the only person who will be at a loss is you.

Purity: The purity of this yellow metal is one of the major factors that derive its price. Hence make sure that you check the purity of your possessions. This will protect you from any fraudulent activities by the fraud buyers.

Trusted Buyer: The most important thing you have to do is do a little survey. Search for the cash for gold where you want to visit. As mentioned earlier, there are many fraud buyers as well. Hence, it becomes really important for you to visit only that buyer that has a good track record in the market.

Once you have checked these things in advance, you need not worry about anything. Just take your possessions to the buyers and earn quick cash for gold.

 

A pair of companies have begun designing what could become Europe’s largest direct-air-capture plant, capable of capturing as much as a million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year and burying it deep beneath the floor of the North Sea.

The sequestered climate pollution will be sold as carbon credits, reflecting the rising demand for carbon removal as a drove of nations and corporations lay out net-zero emissions plans that rely heavily, whether directly or indirectly, on using trees, machines, or other means to pull carbon dioxide out of the air.

Climate researchers say the world may need billions of tons of carbon dioxide removal annually by midcentury to address the “residual emissions” from things like aviation and agriculture that we can’t affordably clean up by then—and to pull the climate back from extremely dangerous levels of warming.

The critical and unanswered question, however, is how much direct air capture will cost—and whether companies and nations will decide they can afford it.

The facility proposed by the two companies, Carbon Engineering and Storegga Geotechnologies, will likely be located in North East Scotland, enabling it to draw on plentiful renewable energy and funnel captured carbon dioxide to nearby sites offshore, the companies said. It’s expected to come online by 2026.

“We can’t stop every [source of] emissions,” says Steve Oldham, chief executive of Carbon Engineering, which is based in British Columbia. “It’s too difficult, too expensive, and too disruptive. That’s where carbon removal comes in. We’re seeing an increasing realization that it’s going to be essential.”

Getting to $100 a ton

Oldham declines to say how much the companies plan to charge for carbon removal, and he says they don’t yet know the per-ton costs they’ll achieve with the European plant.

But he is confident it will eventually reach the target cost levels for direct air capture identified in a 2018 analysis in Joule, led by Carbon Engineering founder and Harvard professor David Keith. It put the range at between $94 and $232 per ton once the technology reaches commercial scale.

Getting to $100 per ton is essentially the point of economic viability, as large US customers generally pay $65 to $110 for carbon dioxide used for commercial purposes, according to a little-noticed May paper by Habib Azarabadi and direct-air-capture pioneer Klaus Lackner, both at Arizona State University’s Center for Negative Carbon Emissions. (The $100 doesn’t include the separate but considerably smaller cost of carbon sequestration.)

At that point, direct air capture could become a reasonably cost-effective way of addressing the 10% to 20% of emissions that will remain too difficult or expensive to eliminate—and may even compete with the cost of capturing carbon dioxide before it leaves power plants and factories, the authors state.

But the best guess is that the sector is nowhere near that level today. In 2019, the Swiss direct-air-capture company Climeworks said its costs were around $500 to $600 per ton.

What it will take to get to that $100 threshold is building a whole bunch of plants, Azarabadi and Lackner found.

Specifically, the study estimates that the direct-air-capture industry will need to grow by a factor of a little more than 300 in order to achieve costs of $100 a ton. That’s based on the “learning rates” of successful technologies, or how rapidly costs declined as their manufacturing capacity grew. Getting direct air capture to that point may require total federal subsidies of $50 million to $2 billion, to cover the difference between the actual costs and market rates for commodity carbon dioxide.

Lackner says the key question is whether their study applied the right learning curves from successful technologies like solar—where costs dropped by roughly a factor of 10 as scale increased 1,000-fold—or if direct air capture falls into a rarer category of technologies where greater learning doesn’t rapidly drive down costs.

“A few hundred million invested in buying down the cost could tell whether this is a good or bad assumption,” he said in an email.

Dreamcatcher

The United Kingdom has set a plan to zero out its emissions by 2050 that will require millions of tons of carbon dioxide removal to balance out the emissions sources likely to still be producing pollution. The government has begun providing millions of dollars to develop a variety of technical approaches to help it hit those targets, including about $350,000 to the Carbon Engineering and Storegga effort, dubbed Project Dreamcatcher.

The plant will likely be located near the so-called Acorn project developed by Scotland-based Storegga’s subsidiary, Pale Blue Dot Energy. The plan is to produce hydrogen from natural gas extracted from the North Sea, while capturing the emissions released in the process. The project would also repurpose existing oil and gas infrastructure on the northeast tip of Scotland to transport the carbon dioxide, which would be injected into sites below the seabed.

The proposed direct-air-capture plant could leverage the same infrastructure for its carbon dioxide storage, Oldham says.

The companies initially expect to build a facility capable of capturing 500,000 tons annually but could eventually double the scale given market demand. Even the low end would far exceed the otherwise largest European facility under way, Climeworks’ Orca facility in Iceland, slated to remove 4,000 tons annually. Only a handful of other small-scale plants have been built around the world.

The expected capacity of the Scotland plant is essentially the same as that of Carbon Engineering’s other full-sized facility, planned for Texas. It will also begin as a half-million-ton-a-year plant with the potential to reach a million. Construction is likely to start on that plant early next year, and it’s expected to begin operation in 2024.

Much of the carbon dioxide captured at that facility, however, will be used for what’s known as enhanced oil recovery: the gas will be injected underground to free up additional oil from petroleum wells in the Permian Basin. If done carefully, that process could potentially produce “carbon neutral” fuels, which at least don’t add more emissions to the atmosphere than were removed.

Oldham agrees that building more plants will be the key to driving costs, noting that Carbon Engineering will see huge declines just from its first plant to its second. How sharply the curve bends from there will depend on how rapidly governments adopt carbon prices or other climate policies that create more demand for carbon removal, he adds. Such policies essentially force “hard-to-solve” sectors like aviation, cement, and steel to start paying someone to clean up their pollution.

 

The number of injuries and fatalities related to car accidents in Los Angeles is on the constant rise. Despite all the effort of the city’s officials to reduce the number of fatalities, there are more car crashes in Los Angeles every day.

In 2015, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti introduced the Vision Zero plan that was supposed to create a 20% drop in all traffic-related fatalities.

However, during the first year of Vision Zero, there was a 43% increase in fatal auto accidents in Los Angeles. In 2017 there was an additional 22% increase in fatal car crashes, and the number of traffic-related deaths continued to grow every year. In 2021, Los Angeles has the highest rate of fatal car accidents and injuries related to motor-vehicle accidents nationwide.

 

Despite Lockdown, Traffic Fatalities Increases

Even the Covid-19 lockdowns couldn’t decrease the number of accidents and deaths in Los Angeles. In 2020 there were 3,723 traffic-related fatalities, even though California wasn’t the one with the highest number of car accidents.

In simple terms, California may have decreased the number of traffic collisions, but they have become more deadly.

 

Post-Lockdown Los Angeles Traffic

Halfway through 2021, Seleta Reynolds, general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, stated that “congestion is back and traffic volumes are creeping back in.” For Los Angeles, this means that once again, a person gets killed in a crash every 36 hours on average. From January to July, that number was as low as 30 hours on average.

 

• Looking at the LAPD data, we learn that DUI crashes have risen 20% and DUI crashes resulting in severe injuries have gone up 73%, while the number of DUI fatal crashes also increased by 9%.
• Next, we have hit and run crashes which have gone up 25%, with those causing severe damages going up 25%.
• Car accidents involving pedestrians have gone up a staggering 45%.
• In addition, bicycle drivers now have a 34% more chance of getting hit by a car in Los Angeles, with a 40% increased risk of getting killed in such a crash.

 

 

 

Dangerous Driving Areas in Los Angeles

The same LAPD data shows that some parts of Los Angeles are disproportionately more dangerous than others. For example, in the first half of 2021, as many as 100 people died in car accidents in the South L.A. and San Fernando Valley regions. The West and Central L.A. together have about 48 car accident fatalities.

Reynolds gives a good explanation of this phenomenon:

“We’ve got a lot of freeways that bisect the southern part of the city. And we’ve got a lot of arterials adjacent to those freeways, like Adams Boulevard, that have not received the kinds of safety treatments that we’ve been trying to get to across the city…

The Valley is another part of the city that has a lot of really wide, fast streets — I think about streets like Victory and Vanowen — because it’s been historically a very car-heavy and car dependent part of the city, due to its land-use patterns. Long distances that people travel to live their lives daily requires them to drive.”

According to a top Los Angeles car accident attorney and the latest UCS-Crosstown LA study, these are the top 5 most dangerous intersections in Los Angeles:

• Sherman Way and Sepulveda Boulevard
• Manchester Avenue and Figueroa Street
• Burbank and Sepulveda boulevards
• Van Nuys and Roscoe boulevards
• Victory Boulevard and Coldwater Canyon Avenue

So, What Are the Odds?

When you look at the CDC reports, you’ll find that you are more likely to die of heart disease more than anything. California’s first cause of death is cardiovascular complications, followed by cancer, Alzheimer’s Disease, and strokes. Car accidents are the fifth leading cause of death in California, but this finding can be misleading.

While it is true that 62,000 people dying from heart diseases in 2019 are a lot more than 3,606 road fatalities, those two conditions depend on different factors.

While heart disease depends on genetics, environmental habits, and other medical conditions, auto accidents depend primarily on our own driving habits. Therefore, they are preventable.

However, if you are interested in numbers, car insurance companies have those ready for you. The data collected shows that an average driver will file a car accident claim every 17.9 years. This means that if you get your license at the age of 16, you’ll have at least three car crashes in your lifetime.

The chances of car accidents increase in teen drivers because they are much less experienced but more prone to alcohol consumption and speeding without wearing a seat belt. The chances of a driver getting killed in a car accident are 1 in 103 for every 1,000 miles driven. However, many factors contribute to these numbers.

Speeding, bad weather, poor road conditions, distracted driving, and driving under the influence are just some of them.

However, the odds of getting injured in a car accident are a bit harder to predict. Looking at the emergency rooms statistics and comparing it with the car accident and fatality data in Los Angeles, for every fatality, there are eight people who need to receive treatment at the emergency room.

The data only shows those car accident victims that need to be treated, but there can be thousands of those suffering from minor injuries or injuries that can be treated at the scene.

 

The number of injuries and fatalities related to car accidents in Los Angeles is on the constant rise. Despite all the effort of the city’s officials to reduce the number of fatalities, there are more car crashes in Los Angeles every day.

In 2015, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti introduced the Vision Zero plan that was supposed to create a 20% drop in all traffic-related fatalities.

However, during the first year of Vision Zero, there was a 43% increase in fatal auto accidents in Los Angeles. In 2017 there was an additional 22% increase in fatal car crashes, and the number of traffic-related deaths continued to grow every year. In 2021, Los Angeles has the highest rate of fatal car accidents and injuries related to motor-vehicle accidents nationwide.

 

Despite Lockdown, Traffic Fatalities Increases

Even the Covid-19 lockdowns couldn’t decrease the number of accidents and deaths in Los Angeles. In 2020 there were 3,723 traffic-related fatalities, even though California wasn’t the one with the highest number of car accidents.

In simple terms, California may have decreased the number of traffic collisions, but they have become more deadly.

 

Post-Lockdown Los Angeles Traffic

Halfway through 2021, Seleta Reynolds, general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, stated that “congestion is back and traffic volumes are creeping back in.” For Los Angeles, this means that once again, a person gets killed in a crash every 36 hours on average. From January to July, that number was as low as 30 hours on average.

 

• Looking at the LAPD data, we learn that DUI crashes have risen 20% and DUI crashes resulting in severe injuries have gone up 73%, while the number of DUI fatal crashes also increased by 9%.
• Next, we have hit and run crashes which have gone up 25%, with those causing severe damages going up 25%.
• Car accidents involving pedestrians have gone up a staggering 45%.
• In addition, bicycle drivers now have a 34% more chance of getting hit by a car in Los Angeles, with a 40% increased risk of getting killed in such a crash.

 

 

 

Dangerous Driving Areas in Los Angeles

The same LAPD data shows that some parts of Los Angeles are disproportionately more dangerous than others. For example, in the first half of 2021, as many as 100 people died in car accidents in the South L.A. and San Fernando Valley regions. The West and Central L.A. together have about 48 car accident fatalities.

Reynolds gives a good explanation of this phenomenon:

“We’ve got a lot of freeways that bisect the southern part of the city. And we’ve got a lot of arterials adjacent to those freeways, like Adams Boulevard, that have not received the kinds of safety treatments that we’ve been trying to get to across the city…

The Valley is another part of the city that has a lot of really wide, fast streets — I think about streets like Victory and Vanowen — because it’s been historically a very car-heavy and car dependent part of the city, due to its land-use patterns. Long distances that people travel to live their lives daily requires them to drive.”

According to a top Los Angeles car accident attorney and the latest UCS-Crosstown LA study, these are the top 5 most dangerous intersections in Los Angeles:

• Sherman Way and Sepulveda Boulevard
• Manchester Avenue and Figueroa Street
• Burbank and Sepulveda boulevards
• Van Nuys and Roscoe boulevards
• Victory Boulevard and Coldwater Canyon Avenue

So, What Are the Odds?

When you look at the CDC reports, you’ll find that you are more likely to die of heart disease more than anything. California’s first cause of death is cardiovascular complications, followed by cancer, Alzheimer’s Disease, and strokes. Car accidents are the fifth leading cause of death in California, but this finding can be misleading.

While it is true that 62,000 people dying from heart diseases in 2019 are a lot more than 3,606 road fatalities, those two conditions depend on different factors.

While heart disease depends on genetics, environmental habits, and other medical conditions, auto accidents depend primarily on our own driving habits. Therefore, they are preventable.

However, if you are interested in numbers, car insurance companies have those ready for you. The data collected shows that an average driver will file a car accident claim every 17.9 years. This means that if you get your license at the age of 16, you’ll have at least three car crashes in your lifetime.

The chances of car accidents increase in teen drivers because they are much less experienced but more prone to alcohol consumption and speeding without wearing a seat belt. The chances of a driver getting killed in a car accident are 1 in 103 for every 1,000 miles driven. However, many factors contribute to these numbers.

Speeding, bad weather, poor road conditions, distracted driving, and driving under the influence are just some of them.

However, the odds of getting injured in a car accident are a bit harder to predict. Looking at the emergency rooms statistics and comparing it with the car accident and fatality data in Los Angeles, for every fatality, there are eight people who need to receive treatment at the emergency room.

The data only shows those car accident victims that need to be treated, but there can be thousands of those suffering from minor injuries or injuries that can be treated at the scene.

JERUSALEM — In an unusually harsh speech, President Mahmoud Abbas on Friday gave Israel one year to end its occupation of territories the Palestinians want for a future state. He threatened to withdraw recognition of Israel — a cornerstone of three decades of failed peace efforts — if it failed to do so.

Abbas delivered the vague ultimatum in a long, prerecorded address to the U.N. General Assembly in which he accused Israel of “apartheid” and “ethnic cleansing,” explosive terms rarely employed by the 85-year-old leader, who has long been committed to a two-state solution.

“If the Israeli occupation authorities continue to entrench the reality of one apartheid state as is happening today, our Palestinian people and the entire world will not tolerate such a situation,” Abbas said. “Circumstances on the ground will inevitably impose equal and full political rights for all on the land of historical Palestine, within one state.”

A one-state solution, while popular with some Israeli and Palestinian activists, would mean the end of Israel as a Jewish-majority state. No major Israeli or Palestinian party supports such an outcome.

Abbas spoke against a backdrop showing the Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem, a flashpoint holy site sacred to Muslims and Jews, and a series of maps of the region showing Israel’s territorial expansion over several decades of war and conflict.

He said he was willing to negotiate final borders over the coming year but that if Israel did not ultimately end its occupation of territories seized in the 1967 war, then he would reconsider recognition of Israel.

“If this is not achieved, why maintain recognition of Israel based on the 1967 borders?” Abbas said. He also threatened to confront Israel at the International Court of Justice.

Gold has always been an integral part of India’s deep and rich culture. The charm and luxury that it holds are beyond anything. However, it has become one of the costliest precious metals in the world. If compared with Silver, the same amount of money that will get you boxes full of Silver would get you just a handful of this yellow metal because of its value.

The major factor behind the surge in prices of this commodity can be contributed to its presence in the ecosystem. As you might know just like many other natural resources, Gold is not available in abundance. But the demand for this commodity has always been rising. This is the reason that its price keeps increasing day by day.

Liquidity

At present, if you wish to purchase this yellow Metal, you have to spend thousands of rupees just to buy a few grams of gold. That is more than enough to burn a hole in one’s pocket. But do you have a stock of ornaments or scrap products made out of it? If yes, then it’s the best time to make some quick money without getting into paper works.

Gold has become one of the highest liquid assets in the world’s economy. Most of the countries are still running their economy depending on yellow metal Reserves. It is sufficient enough to tell the importance of this metal at this time. There are situations when we need quick cash. These situations never give a hint before entering our lives.

That time becomes very difficult for us to arrange quick cash. However, if you have old jewelry in your house, then you need not worry even for a second. In India, you will find many gold buyers that are ready to buy your ornaments of scrap items made out of this metal. You find cash for gold in Gurgaon, Delhi, Noida, and in many cities of India.

Sell Gold for Cash

You can easily your yellow metal for cash to these buyers. All they need is your items and that is enough for them to give out cash in return. The process of converting your cash into gold is a very easy process. You do not need any kind of papers or bills to initiate the process.

All you have to do is visit and Gold Buyer near your place and hand him your possessions. In return of these possessions, he will offer you cash as per the weight. However, there are many things that you would have to consider before taking your ornaments. This is because there are many buyers whose only intention is to deceive you by committing fraudulent activities.

Below mentioned are some of the ways that will protect you from these fraudulent buyers. Make sure you read them carefully.

Weigh your gold: if you have the required machine at your house, do weigh your possessions at the home in advance. In case you happen to meet a cheat buyer, he will try to make false claims regarding the weight of gold. It will help him in making a deal where the only person who will be at a loss is you.

Purity: The purity of this yellow metal is one of the major factors that derive its price. Hence make sure that you check the purity of your possessions. This will protect you from any fraudulent activities by the fraud buyers.

Trusted Buyer: The most important thing you have to do is do a little survey. Search for the cash for gold where you want to visit. As mentioned earlier, there are many fraud buyers as well. Hence, it becomes really important for you to visit only that buyer that has a good track record in the market.

Once you have checked these things in advance, you need not worry about anything. Just take your possessions to the buyers and earn quick cash for gold.

 

A pair of companies have begun designing what could become Europe’s largest direct-air-capture plant, capable of capturing as much as a million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year and burying it deep beneath the floor of the North Sea.

The sequestered climate pollution will be sold as carbon credits, reflecting the rising demand for carbon removal as a drove of nations and corporations lay out net-zero emissions plans that rely heavily, whether directly or indirectly, on using trees, machines, or other means to pull carbon dioxide out of the air.

Climate researchers say the world may need billions of tons of carbon dioxide removal annually by midcentury to address the “residual emissions” from things like aviation and agriculture that we can’t affordably clean up by then—and to pull the climate back from extremely dangerous levels of warming.

The critical and unanswered question, however, is how much direct air capture will cost—and whether companies and nations will decide they can afford it.

The facility proposed by the two companies, Carbon Engineering and Storegga Geotechnologies, will likely be located in North East Scotland, enabling it to draw on plentiful renewable energy and funnel captured carbon dioxide to nearby sites offshore, the companies said. It’s expected to come online by 2026.

“We can’t stop every [source of] emissions,” says Steve Oldham, chief executive of Carbon Engineering, which is based in British Columbia. “It’s too difficult, too expensive, and too disruptive. That’s where carbon removal comes in. We’re seeing an increasing realization that it’s going to be essential.”

Getting to $100 a ton

Oldham declines to say how much the companies plan to charge for carbon removal, and he says they don’t yet know the per-ton costs they’ll achieve with the European plant.

But he is confident it will eventually reach the target cost levels for direct air capture identified in a 2018 analysis in Joule, led by Carbon Engineering founder and Harvard professor David Keith. It put the range at between $94 and $232 per ton once the technology reaches commercial scale.

Getting to $100 per ton is essentially the point of economic viability, as large US customers generally pay $65 to $110 for carbon dioxide used for commercial purposes, according to a little-noticed May paper by Habib Azarabadi and direct-air-capture pioneer Klaus Lackner, both at Arizona State University’s Center for Negative Carbon Emissions. (The $100 doesn’t include the separate but considerably smaller cost of carbon sequestration.)

At that point, direct air capture could become a reasonably cost-effective way of addressing the 10% to 20% of emissions that will remain too difficult or expensive to eliminate—and may even compete with the cost of capturing carbon dioxide before it leaves power plants and factories, the authors state.

But the best guess is that the sector is nowhere near that level today. In 2019, the Swiss direct-air-capture company Climeworks said its costs were around $500 to $600 per ton.

What it will take to get to that $100 threshold is building a whole bunch of plants, Azarabadi and Lackner found.

Specifically, the study estimates that the direct-air-capture industry will need to grow by a factor of a little more than 300 in order to achieve costs of $100 a ton. That’s based on the “learning rates” of successful technologies, or how rapidly costs declined as their manufacturing capacity grew. Getting direct air capture to that point may require total federal subsidies of $50 million to $2 billion, to cover the difference between the actual costs and market rates for commodity carbon dioxide.

Lackner says the key question is whether their study applied the right learning curves from successful technologies like solar—where costs dropped by roughly a factor of 10 as scale increased 1,000-fold—or if direct air capture falls into a rarer category of technologies where greater learning doesn’t rapidly drive down costs.

“A few hundred million invested in buying down the cost could tell whether this is a good or bad assumption,” he said in an email.

Dreamcatcher

The United Kingdom has set a plan to zero out its emissions by 2050 that will require millions of tons of carbon dioxide removal to balance out the emissions sources likely to still be producing pollution. The government has begun providing millions of dollars to develop a variety of technical approaches to help it hit those targets, including about $350,000 to the Carbon Engineering and Storegga effort, dubbed Project Dreamcatcher.

The plant will likely be located near the so-called Acorn project developed by Scotland-based Storegga’s subsidiary, Pale Blue Dot Energy. The plan is to produce hydrogen from natural gas extracted from the North Sea, while capturing the emissions released in the process. The project would also repurpose existing oil and gas infrastructure on the northeast tip of Scotland to transport the carbon dioxide, which would be injected into sites below the seabed.

The proposed direct-air-capture plant could leverage the same infrastructure for its carbon dioxide storage, Oldham says.

The companies initially expect to build a facility capable of capturing 500,000 tons annually but could eventually double the scale given market demand. Even the low end would far exceed the otherwise largest European facility under way, Climeworks’ Orca facility in Iceland, slated to remove 4,000 tons annually. Only a handful of other small-scale plants have been built around the world.

The expected capacity of the Scotland plant is essentially the same as that of Carbon Engineering’s other full-sized facility, planned for Texas. It will also begin as a half-million-ton-a-year plant with the potential to reach a million. Construction is likely to start on that plant early next year, and it’s expected to begin operation in 2024.

Much of the carbon dioxide captured at that facility, however, will be used for what’s known as enhanced oil recovery: the gas will be injected underground to free up additional oil from petroleum wells in the Permian Basin. If done carefully, that process could potentially produce “carbon neutral” fuels, which at least don’t add more emissions to the atmosphere than were removed.

Oldham agrees that building more plants will be the key to driving costs, noting that Carbon Engineering will see huge declines just from its first plant to its second. How sharply the curve bends from there will depend on how rapidly governments adopt carbon prices or other climate policies that create more demand for carbon removal, he adds. Such policies essentially force “hard-to-solve” sectors like aviation, cement, and steel to start paying someone to clean up their pollution.

 

The number of injuries and fatalities related to car accidents in Los Angeles is on the constant rise. Despite all the effort of the city’s officials to reduce the number of fatalities, there are more car crashes in Los Angeles every day.

In 2015, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti introduced the Vision Zero plan that was supposed to create a 20% drop in all traffic-related fatalities.

However, during the first year of Vision Zero, there was a 43% increase in fatal auto accidents in Los Angeles. In 2017 there was an additional 22% increase in fatal car crashes, and the number of traffic-related deaths continued to grow every year. In 2021, Los Angeles has the highest rate of fatal car accidents and injuries related to motor-vehicle accidents nationwide.

 

Despite Lockdown, Traffic Fatalities Increases

Even the Covid-19 lockdowns couldn’t decrease the number of accidents and deaths in Los Angeles. In 2020 there were 3,723 traffic-related fatalities, even though California wasn’t the one with the highest number of car accidents.

In simple terms, California may have decreased the number of traffic collisions, but they have become more deadly.

 

Post-Lockdown Los Angeles Traffic

Halfway through 2021, Seleta Reynolds, general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, stated that “congestion is back and traffic volumes are creeping back in.” For Los Angeles, this means that once again, a person gets killed in a crash every 36 hours on average. From January to July, that number was as low as 30 hours on average.

 

• Looking at the LAPD data, we learn that DUI crashes have risen 20% and DUI crashes resulting in severe injuries have gone up 73%, while the number of DUI fatal crashes also increased by 9%.
• Next, we have hit and run crashes which have gone up 25%, with those causing severe damages going up 25%.
• Car accidents involving pedestrians have gone up a staggering 45%.
• In addition, bicycle drivers now have a 34% more chance of getting hit by a car in Los Angeles, with a 40% increased risk of getting killed in such a crash.

 

 

 

Dangerous Driving Areas in Los Angeles

The same LAPD data shows that some parts of Los Angeles are disproportionately more dangerous than others. For example, in the first half of 2021, as many as 100 people died in car accidents in the South L.A. and San Fernando Valley regions. The West and Central L.A. together have about 48 car accident fatalities.

Reynolds gives a good explanation of this phenomenon:

“We’ve got a lot of freeways that bisect the southern part of the city. And we’ve got a lot of arterials adjacent to those freeways, like Adams Boulevard, that have not received the kinds of safety treatments that we’ve been trying to get to across the city…

The Valley is another part of the city that has a lot of really wide, fast streets — I think about streets like Victory and Vanowen — because it’s been historically a very car-heavy and car dependent part of the city, due to its land-use patterns. Long distances that people travel to live their lives daily requires them to drive.”

According to a top Los Angeles car accident attorney and the latest UCS-Crosstown LA study, these are the top 5 most dangerous intersections in Los Angeles:

• Sherman Way and Sepulveda Boulevard
• Manchester Avenue and Figueroa Street
• Burbank and Sepulveda boulevards
• Van Nuys and Roscoe boulevards
• Victory Boulevard and Coldwater Canyon Avenue

So, What Are the Odds?

When you look at the CDC reports, you’ll find that you are more likely to die of heart disease more than anything. California’s first cause of death is cardiovascular complications, followed by cancer, Alzheimer’s Disease, and strokes. Car accidents are the fifth leading cause of death in California, but this finding can be misleading.

While it is true that 62,000 people dying from heart diseases in 2019 are a lot more than 3,606 road fatalities, those two conditions depend on different factors.

While heart disease depends on genetics, environmental habits, and other medical conditions, auto accidents depend primarily on our own driving habits. Therefore, they are preventable.

However, if you are interested in numbers, car insurance companies have those ready for you. The data collected shows that an average driver will file a car accident claim every 17.9 years. This means that if you get your license at the age of 16, you’ll have at least three car crashes in your lifetime.

The chances of car accidents increase in teen drivers because they are much less experienced but more prone to alcohol consumption and speeding without wearing a seat belt. The chances of a driver getting killed in a car accident are 1 in 103 for every 1,000 miles driven. However, many factors contribute to these numbers.

Speeding, bad weather, poor road conditions, distracted driving, and driving under the influence are just some of them.

However, the odds of getting injured in a car accident are a bit harder to predict. Looking at the emergency rooms statistics and comparing it with the car accident and fatality data in Los Angeles, for every fatality, there are eight people who need to receive treatment at the emergency room.

The data only shows those car accident victims that need to be treated, but there can be thousands of those suffering from minor injuries or injuries that can be treated at the scene.